Liberalism a political thoery... essays

Liberalism a political thoery... essays Liberalism is a political theory that maintains the rationality of human nature. Assuming that humans are reasonable and freethinking should be given the opportunity to fulfil their economic potential. Liberalism rational view on human nature lends itself to the economic theory of capitalism. In this essay I will attempt to prove the veracity of this statement. Firstly, Liberalism allows young entrepreneurs to start their own business, but that includes many taxes. Capitalism also allows entrepreneurs to start their own business, but with as little interference as possible. In both political theorys we are free to have control on our life, though liberalism favors the help of government in ones life for economic or health issues, (social insurance, welfare) capitalism on the other hand lets you be in TOTAL control of your life, lending you no help. Both governments supply matters of law. Secondly, Both these political ideologies favor the profit motive. Were you can start your own business at your risks. But in the case of liberalism you can have a bankruptcy protection plan supplied to you by the government. Thirdly, The laws of supply and demand are the same for both ideologies; the producer offers a price, while the consumers try bargaining the price for their own good. The more customers want, the more you have to produce and you are free to do this without a quota. Fourthly, Both government theories have sub-divisions for each sector for example: health, education, foreign affairs etc. These divisions are made so that the power is divided within the government so that the power is not given to one individual in particular. In both theorys you have a right to elect each and every member of government. Leaving much room so that the voices of the people can be heard. Finally to conclude, Liberalism and Capitalism both share common points in theory. Weather it is the way government is divided,...

whether or not the Brigade s essays

whether or not the Brigade s essays Violent films, such as the Brigade, have been blamed for causing crime rates to rise in our country: whether or not the Brigade should be taken off the air The crime rate in many cities is rising alarmingly. Some people have the idea that violent films, for example the Brigade, are the cause of real crime. However many others disagree that TV violence can be blamed for this rise. While both sides of the question of whether violent film the Brigade may or may not be to blame are supported by good reasons, personally, I am against the removal of violent films. Those who believe that violent TV films cause crime give many reasons. First, many viewers are children who have not formed a strong understanding of right and wrong. They often imitate what they see. If a person on TV gets what she or he wants by stealing it, a child may copy this behaviour. Thus, the child has learned unacceptable values. Second, many heroes in todays programs achieve their goals by violent means. For example, in the Brigade the main characters, Sasha Belyi, Kos, Fill, and Pchela, achieve their goals and become very rich by means of violence, illegality, and lawlessness which even comes to murder. Unfortunately, viewers might get used to this kind of life shown on TV and might use similar means to achieve their objectives, thus somehow resulting in an increase in crime rate. Finally, people get ideas about how to commit crimes from watching TV. For this reason heroes from violent films can sometimes set not a very good example. Other people, whom I also relate to, argue that violent films have no relation to the rise in crime rates. First, they claim that social factors, such as unemployment and homelessness, are to blame. Nowadays it is very difficult to lead productive life by means of having no job, no government support but having wife and children. It means that social press...

Sam 489 unit 9 Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Sam 489 unit 9 - Assignment Example this regard, the 911 commission conducted investigations across the government’s security departments and presented its findings to the then president George Bush (Haddow, Bullock & Coppola, 2011). The major findings/recommendations of the 911 commission were that the security intelligence failed to prevent the attacks. It emerged that the intelligence failed to disclose vital information obtained at the airports, before and after the attacks, to the military and police forces. This is because the commission realized that there were loopholes at the airport when the terrorists accessed the country to execute the attacks (Haddow, Bullock & Coppola, 2011). The commission also found that most of the attackers were Saudi Arabian citizens drawn from the Al-Qaeda terrorist organization. The evidence was derived from video footages obtained from the airport control unit (Felzenberg, 2006). As a result, the commissioners recommended more funding to be added towards the security kitty to enable them to adequately prepare. The Bush administration received grades from the commission on their efforts towards national security. For instance, the Congress performance was low because it failed to mark terrorism as a major policy to handle. The intelligence agencies were also ranked below average because of their failure to liaise with other security department for maximum protection (Haddow, Bullock & Coppola, 2011). It is apparent that the government did not consider threats from Al-Qaeda to be serious and ignored calls for tight security measures along the borders. The report grading also indicated that the citizens should be vigilant by cooperating with the security teams in case of threats or risks in their neighborhoods (Haddow, Bullock & Coppola, 2011). The grading provided a challenge to the US government to design new measures of approach the emergent terrorist extremism. This is because the occurrence of the 911 attacks exposed considerable challenges and